ALOT??4tyson said:Hello,
How is the factory steron in the FX. Do the 2 small subs actually pump out a lot of low end> Let me know.
Thanks
ding ding ding ding ding ding4tyson said:so basically to get some good sound i should start putting together a new custom stereo?
I had a 2003 FX for 8 months, now I have 04. My 04 sounds great! Maybe even better than the 2003 FX35. Perhaps the cheap speakers are not quite as cheap, or it could be that the rattles which plagued my 2003 detracted from the stereo sound. Or, it could be the XM radio that my 04 has (but i use CDs too). I heard "Get Low" and "Milkshake" over XM radio and was amazed at the stereo's quality.GEAUX said:I have to agree above. It is not too bad for stock systems, but it is typical bose. No highs and No lows.....It must be Bose!!!!!!!
EQ would help the system.
I have both of those on CD-R, and they sound just fine for me in my FX, too (and I've got a fairly decent set of car audio experiences to draw on). Don't forget, the stereo in FXen is tuned for rock, hip-hop and R&B, and the like (the expected demographic); perhaps if your genre is different, you won't like it so much.dinofx35 said:I heard "Get Low" and "Milkshake" over XM radio and was amazed at the stereo's quality.
I feel that I need to clarify myself. I am not complaining about the system. I just think Bose is overrated and the spectrum of music, although better than many, is no where near the best. But if you look around, it seems that everyone has Bose in their new cars. Oddly enough, some are much better than others. The best BOSE I have had was tied between my 97 Maxima SE and my 93 300ZXTT. But the best I have had was an infiniti system that was in a Jeep Grand Cherokee.dinofx35 said:I had a 2003 FX for 8 months, now I have 04. My 04 sounds great! Maybe even better than the 2003 FX35. Perhaps the cheap speakers are not quite as cheap, or it could be that the rattles which plagued my 2003 detracted from the stereo sound. Or, it could be the XM radio that my 04 has (but i use CDs too). I heard "Get Low" and "Milkshake" over XM radio and was amazed at the stereo's quality.GEAUX said:I have to agree above. It is not too bad for stock systems, but it is typical bose. No highs and No lows.....It must be Bose!!!!!!!
EQ would help the system.
I am not saying that the stereo cannot be improved, but I just can't believe how many people actually feel the need to complain about it. I agree that an equalizer would be very nice (although very rare on any OEM). I hate how on all cars with sub-wolfers, you have to turn the Bass down slightly. It's like the stereos are tuned for use without subs. Maybe for the G35's?
the 'premium' bose system in the murano is very poor, imo....GEAUX said:I feel that I need to clarify myself. I am not complaining about the system. I just think Bose is overrated and the spectrum of music, although better than many, is no where near the best. But if you look around, it seems that everyone has Bose in their new cars. Oddly enough, some are much better than others. The best BOSE I have had was tied between my 97 Maxima SE and my 93 300ZXTT. But the best I have had was an infiniti system that was in a Jeep Grand Cherokee.dinofx35 said:I had a 2003 FX for 8 months, now I have 04. My 04 sounds great! Maybe even better than the 2003 FX35. Perhaps the cheap speakers are not quite as cheap, or it could be that the rattles which plagued my 2003 detracted from the stereo sound. Or, it could be the XM radio that my 04 has (but i use CDs too). I heard "Get Low" and "Milkshake" over XM radio and was amazed at the stereo's quality.GEAUX said:I have to agree above. It is not too bad for stock systems, but it is typical bose. No highs and No lows.....It must be Bose!!!!!!!
EQ would help the system.
I am not saying that the stereo cannot be improved, but I just can't believe how many people actually feel the need to complain about it. I agree that an equalizer would be very nice (although very rare on any OEM). I hate how on all cars with sub-wolfers, you have to turn the Bass down slightly. It's like the stereos are tuned for use without subs. Maybe for the G35's?
Sorry to anger anyone, that was not my intent.![]()
"Anger"?! Aw, c'mon ....GEAUX said:Sorry to anger anyone
Let me defend my defense, defensively.GEAUX said:I feel that I need to clarify myself. I am not complaining about the system. I just think Bose is overrated and the spectrum of music, although better than many, is no where near the best. But if you look around, it seems that everyone has Bose in their new cars. Oddly enough, some are much better than others. The best BOSE I have had was tied between my 97 Maxima SE and my 93 300ZXTT. But the best I have had was an infiniti system that was in a Jeep Grand Cherokee.dinofx35 said:I had a 2003 FX for 8 months, now I have 04. My 04 sounds .....GEAUX said:I have to agree above. It is not too bad for stock systems, but it is typical bose. No highs and No lows.....It must be Bose!!!!!!!
EQ would help the system.
re on any OEM). I hate how on all cars with sub-wolfers, you have to turn the Bass down slightly. It's like the stereos are tuned for use without subs. Maybe for the G35's?
Sorry to anger anyone, that was not my intent.![]()
There are no 8" subs. We could only dream. They're 2 5.25" bass radiators (if ya can call them that) on top of the spare tire.mushutofu said:Can someone tell me where those two 8" speakers are located?
Do you think swapping them out for one with a bigger magnet would be feasible...will it fit for one and will the stock stereo be able to pump enough juice into them. Supposedly its a 300 watt stereo system