GJBenn85 wrote:
I find it very hard to believe Infiniti has slipped below a Chrysler product in terms of initial quality.
I do agree with johnmax that owners of certain brands are going to be less likely to complain about problems than owners of brands with a reputation of being flawless. I am more accepting of poor quality on my dad's F150 than I am on a Toyota, for example, even if both vehicles cost $40k+.
Exactly. I am not saying that Nissans/Infinitis are without their problems, because they aren't, but I cannot fathom that the Infiniti brand is a worse bet than Chrysler/Jeep. Sorry Weatherman, I'm just not buying it. And your mention of not having as many problems with your Ford Probe and Ford Explorer as you do with your current cars almost made me laugh. Almost.
My first car was a 1990 Nissan Stanza - bought it with 94k miles, never took it in for more than regular maintenance. My girlfriend at the time had a 1994 Ford Exploder - at 50k miles, her Ford had more rattles and check engine lights coming on than I had ever seen. My next car was a 1997 Honda Accord - this thing was bulletproof, I did oil changes and tire rotations, that was about it. During that time, my sister owned a 1997 Ford F150 - again, rattles galore, along with the check engine lights. One of my buddies in the Marines had a 1996 Ford Escort - I drove that thing once and though it was the biggest piece of crap. Lots of plastic, lots of rattles. Of course, what does a Ford owner expect? Once in the Marines, I was tasked with driving a group of guys down to San Diego in a rental van. It was a brand new Ford Econoline V10 15-pass van, just a few thousand miles on the odo. Within the first 30 minutes of driving it, the radio began to turn the volume up gradually
on its own! I tried to turn the radio off, and it wouldn't. I swear it was possessed. My next vehicle was/is my 2004 FX35. I would say the build quality is just as good as my Honda, but with more gadgets comes more opportunities for problems. My wife owned a 2003 Infiniti G35 (first year vehicle), and it was more reliable than my FX. She now drives a 2003 Nissan Z, and we've done nothing but change the oil and do the brakes.
Weatherman, I have to believe that the reason you're having as many problems with your Nissan products is that they were first year designs. I don't think its any coincidence. What I think is ironic is that you are pointing to the OP's statistics and saying "see, it's what I've thought all along", and yet you are saying that a Range Rover Sport is more reliable and you wish you had one. You do realize that JD Power and Assoc. ranked Land Rover last or second to last in vehicle dependability pretty much every year in the past decade, and Consumer Reports ranked it last in vehicle reliability in 2006 and second to last in 2007. The CR 2009 Reliabiity survey ranked Land Rover dead last, and the writers commented "The worst, the Land Rover Range Rover, had 140 problems [per 100 vehicles]". And you seriously think a Range Rover is more reliable than your FX?